Skip to the content

Understanding fund costs

01 September 2024

Understanding fund costs is critically important for investors. These costs can significantly impact the net returns on investment over time. From ongoing charges to transaction fees, the expenses associated with fund investing require careful consideration. This article looks at the various types of fund costs prevalent in the UK, highlighting the importance of transparency and cost-efficiency for investors.

 

TYPES OF FUND COST

In the UK, investors encounter several types of costs when investing in funds, including management fees, performance fees, transaction costs and platform fees. Each of these plays a role in the overall cost of fund ownership.

Management fees: These are ongoing charges paid to the fund manager for their investment services. Typically expressed as a percentage of the assets under management, these fees cover the cost of making investment decisions, research and administration.

Performance fees: Some funds charge a performance fee, which is a cost incurred by the investor if the fund achieves performance above a certain benchmark. This aligns the interests of the fund managers with the investors, incentivising managers to outperform the market.

Transaction costs: These are costs associated with buying and selling underlying investments within the fund. While not always immediately visible to the investor, they can affect the fund's overall performance and returns. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the UK mandates that these costs be disclosed to investors to ensure transparency.

Platform fees: Many investors access funds through online platforms or brokers, which may charge their own set of fees. These can be flat fees or a percentage of the assets invested through the platform.

 

IMPACT OF FUND COSTS ON INVESTMENT RETURNS

The impact of these costs on investment returns cannot be overstated. Even seemingly small differences in fees can compound over time, leading to significant variances in net returns. For example, an annual management fee of 2% versus 0.5% on a fund can lead to a substantial difference in the investment's growth over a decade due to the compounding effect of costs.

 

THE PUSH FOR COST TRANSPARENCY IN THE UK

In the UK, the FCA has placed a strong emphasis on cost transparency in the investment industry. This includes the introduction of the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPs) regulation and enhancements to the Key Information Document (KID), which require funds to clearly disclose their costs and charges to investors. These regulatory measures aim to empower investors to make more informed decisions by understanding the full cost implications of their investments.

 

ASSESSING FUND COSTS

When assessing fund costs, investors should look beyond the headline figures and consider the ongoing charges figure (OCF) or total expense ratio (TER), which provides a more comprehensive view of the annual costs associated with holding a fund. Additionally, considering the cost per unit of return can help investors assess whether higher fees are justified by superior fund performance.

 

So, fund costs play a crucial role in investment decision-making and portfolio management. By understanding and carefully evaluating these costs, investors can make informed choices that align with their investment goals and risk tolerance. The regulatory focus on cost transparency serves to protect and inform investors, ensuring a fairer and more transparent investment environment.

 

 

This Trustnet Learn article was written with assistance from artificial intelligence (AI). For more information, please visit our AI Statement.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.