Connecting: 18.188.99.196
Forwarded: 18.188.99.196, 172.71.28.137:28478
FTSE tracker funds fail on income front | Trustnet Skip to the content

FTSE tracker funds fail on income front

18 July 2013

Ten of the 11 funds that track the FTSE 100 yield less than the index, and the figures are even worse for funds that seek to replicate the FTSE All Share.

By Jenna Voigt,

Features Editor, FE Trustnet

Funds that track the FTSE All Share and FTSE 100 index do not stack up to their benchmark in terms of yield, according to research from FE Trustnet.

While passive funds are often much cheaper than their actively managed counterparts, for investors looking for a steady stream of income, active funds are far more compelling.

Of the 11 funds that track the FTSE 100, only the Santander Stockmarket 100 tracker is yielding more.

The Santander tracker is yielding 4.13 per cent while the FTSE 100 is yielding 3.68 per cent. The average fund that tracks the FTSE 100 has a yield of just 2.4 per cent.

Top-5 highest-yielding FTSE 100 trackers

Name Yield (%)
FTSE 100 3.68
Santander Stockmarket 100 Tracker Growth 4.13
HSBC FTSE 100 Index 3.24
L&G UK 100 Index 2.7
Aviva Investors Blue Chip tracking 2.6
RBS FTSE 100 tracker 2.57

Source: FE Analytics

There isn’t a single fund that aims to replicate the FTSE All Share that is yielding more than index’s 3.56 per cent. The average FTSE All Share tracker is paying out 2.74 per cent.

Top-five highest-yielding FTSE All Share trackers

Name Yield (%)
FTSE All Share 3.56
Scottish Mutual UK All Share 3.35
HSBC FTSE All Share index 3.15
Vanguard FTSE UK Equity index 3.13
Vanguard FTSE UK UK All Share index 3.12
Liontrust FTSE 100 tracker 3.11

Source: FE Analytics

Charles Stanley Direct’s Rob Morgan (pictured) says the discrepancy likely comes from the fact that tracker funds often take their charges from income rather than from capital, which would reduce their overall yield.

ALT_TAG However, he says he was surprised at the extent of the difference for the majority of FTSE 100 and FTSE All Share trackers.

"Charges are taken from income rather than from capital so you would expect them to yield less, but I am surprised by the extent," he said.

"I would expect half a percentage point coming off the yield, so I would expect about 3 per cent from a tracker. However, most people who are buying a tracker are likely to be looking for growth rather than income, and if you’re purely focused on cost, a tracker is still the way to go."

Still, Morgan says if the yield is far off that of the underlying index, investors need to understand what causes the discrepancy in the way the fund is run.

"If the fund is buying derivatives rather than actual securities, you might end up with some strange yield figures," he said.


Head of FE Research Rob Gleeson says the difference in yield comes down to the replication strategy the passive fund is utilising, which has a chance of picking up lower-yielding stocks.

He says significantly lower yields are another feather in the cap for actively managed funds, because they are required to pay out more than the index.

"UK Equity Income funds are required to yield 120 per cent of the index, so you’re always going to get a higher yield," he said.

However, there are a few ways investors can get a comparable yield from passive investments.


HSBC FTSE 100 ETF

This exchange traded fund is yielding 3.3 per cent, less than 0.4 percentage points off its FTSE 100 benchmark.

However, it has underperformed over the last one and three years, returning 34.87 per cent over three years, while the FTSE 100 index gained 41.93 per cent.

Performance of fund vs index over 3yrs

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics

It has tracked the index with an error of 4.62 per cent over the period.

Among its top holdings are its namesake, HSBC, Vodafone and BP. The largest sector weighting is to basic materials followed by consumer products and financials.

The fund has an extremely low total expense ratio (TER) compared with actively managed funds, at 0.35 per cent.


iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF

With a yield of 3.51 per cent, the £3.8bn iShares FTSE 100 UCITS ETF is only yielding 0.2 percentage points less than its benchmark.

The fund has performed broadly in line with the FTSE 100 over the last one, three, five and 10 years.

Over the last three years it has gained 39.95 per cent while the index has made 41.93 per cent.

It has ongoing charges of just 0.4 per cent.



DB x-trackers FTSE All Share UCITS ETF

The passive fund is yielding 3.36 per cent, only marginally less than the FTSE All Share.

It has tracked the index with an error of 4.17 per cent over the last three years and has ongoing charges of just 0.4 per cent.

Like the iShares vehicle, the DB x-tracker has performed in line with the FTSE All Share over one, three and five years, gaining 52.18 per cent over the last five years. The All Share made 55.47 per cent, according to FE Analytics.
ALT_TAG

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.