Skip to the content

Emerging market debt “less risky” than developed

18 November 2011

While liquidity remains a problem in the sector, the case for developing economies’ fixed income is getting stronger by the day.

By Joshua Ausden,

Reporter, FE Trustnet

Improving corporate governance and the ailing state of the European economy have made emerging market debt less risky than its developed counterpart on a long-term basis, according to Darius McDermott, managing director of Chelsea Financial.

While emerging markets are generally viewed as more volatile, McDermott thinks this assumption will be tested in the next 10 years.

"Although day-to-day volatility in emerging markets is generally higher, on a long-term basis I think every pound invested in a GEM debt fund is at less risk than a developed market debt fund," he said.

"With gilt yields where they are and valuations exceedingly high across the developed market space, all the macro points to emerging markets as a safer investment."

McDermott thinks the risks usually associated with emerging market debt have become less pronounced in recent years.

"Currencies are much stronger and more predictable, their banking systems and government debt levels are in far better shape and their accountancy standards have also improved," he added.

"While emerging market corporate governance is improving, over here in the West it’s just getting worse."

"There are obviously still risks involved, particularly with regard to liquidity issues. Investors pulling away from emerging market debt and taking profits in recent months have had a big part to play in the recent dip in performance."

"However, that said, on a 10-year view I think investment grade emerging market debt is still a safer bet."

Performance of sectors vs average fund over 1-yr

ALT_TAG

Source: FE Analytics


There are currently 14 emerging market debt funds in the IMA unit trust and OEIC universe, including three absolute return vehicles – Henderson Emerging Market Debt Absolute Return, and the Schroder ISF Emerging Europe Debt Absolute Return and Emerging Markets Debt Absolute Return funds.

As well as significantly outperforming them over three, five and 10 years, there is already evidence that emerging market debt funds are closing the gap on their developed rivals in terms of risk.

The Threadneedle Emerging Market Bond fund, for example, has the same FE Risk Score as the average IMA UK Gilt fund. Moreover, all but three emerging market bond funds have a lower risk score than the average vehicle in the IMA Sterling High Yield sector.

Performance and risk of funds vs sectors over 5-yrs

Name
FE Risk Score
5-yr returns (%)
Investec Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt
56
94.91
Invesco Emerging Markets Bond 
48
63.43
Threadneedle Emerging Market Bond 
36
57.55
Schroder ISF Emerging Europe Debt Absolute Return 
44
53.77
M&G Emerging Markets Bond
42
51.5
Schroder ISF Emerging Markets Debt Absolute Return
36
50.14
IMA Global Bonds
20
45.38
IMA UK Gilt
36
37.75
Schroder ISF Asian Bond Absolute Return
38
31.7
IMA Sterling High Yield
51
19.75
Henderson Emerging Market Debt Absolute Return
12
6.89

Source: FE Analytics


"In the last 12 to 18 months emerging market debt has been a bull asset class. Though demand has come off a little recently, I think it will become an even more important part of investors’ portfolios in the future," McDermott finished.

Editor's Picks

Loading...

Videos from BNY Mellon Investment Management

Loading...

Data provided by FE fundinfo. Care has been taken to ensure that the information is correct, but FE fundinfo neither warrants, represents nor guarantees the contents of information, nor does it accept any responsibility for errors, inaccuracies, omissions or any inconsistencies herein. Past performance does not predict future performance, it should not be the main or sole reason for making an investment decision. The value of investments and any income from them can fall as well as rise.